

A | Dhaka, Oct 11 (UNI) China wants to implement the Teesta master plan. Chinese Ambassador Li Ziming visited the Teesta Barrage and said this on Sunday.
On October 10, Ambassador Li Jiming called on Mr. Md. Sabirul Islam, Divisional Commissioner of Rangpur, and Mr. Md. Asif Ahasan, Deputy Commissioner of Rangpur District. Ambassador Li also met with local officials and engineers of Bangladesh Water Development Board.
China wants to lend a billion dollars to this project as a sponsor. China will implement the Teesta Master Plan through its people with loans. This project will include river mining, char mining, construction of satellite cities on both sides, solar power projects, naval terminals and many other things.
But experts say the project will be a white elephant with Chinese loan money. Bangladesh will get stuck in the net of Chinese debt. The way China trapped Sri Lanka, Pakistan in debt net.
International water expert, Lock Haven University professor Dr. Md. Khalekuzzaman has been calling this project ambitious and anti-nature since the beginning. He thinks that if this project is implemented, more terrible disaster will occur in the northern region including Tistapar.
Experts say, canceling the claim of fair share of Teesta river water with India, if this master plan is taken internally, India's unilateral control over Teesta will be recognized. India will no longer want to give water. It would be a suicidal decision.
China's debt trap on the other hand gives India control of the Teesta. A powerful syndicate wants to collect China's debt to Bangladesh. What could be the reason, everyone more or less knows what happens in projects in the name of river dredging.
Bangladeshi media personality Shankar Maitra told UNI, “This project needs more thought and research by the country's scientists and experts. One must also wonder why China has stepped up to give loans to the unprofitable sector. We also know what happens in the name of river mining, how corruption happens in the name of protecting dams”.
He said, "I think India must give its fair share of Teesta water to Bangladesh. This demand cannot be withdrawn".
Dhaka University Professor Major Nazmul Ahsan Kalimullah said, India is in great danger. The chicken neck in the Seven Sisters issue may be out of India's hands.
He said, "India has brought its own danger.
As a result of the tug of war between the Central Government of India and the provincial governments on the Teesta issue, Bangladesh has also withdrawn from the Teesta, while China has missed this opportunity. Bangladesh has waited for a long time.
He said, "We do not digest water?" Is our production stopped? Our hilsa fish production has collapsed? Certainly not.
UNI MAZ GNK。

B | 然而问题就这样放过去了。人们只能理解为:张丹丹没有觉得这段话有严重不妥;节目编辑者如果不存恶意的话,也不觉得这段话可能给她带来灾难性的声誉打击。

C | 老胡查了劳动经济学的有关说法,的确存在补偿性工资差异理论,该模型假设劳动者可以自由选择,用一部分福利保障换取时间上的自由度。但该理论成立有一个前提,即劳动者拥有充分选择权,既可以选择稳定工作,也可以选择自由度更高的灵活就业。然而当下的现实是,大部分劳动者选择灵活就业是被动的。因为现实中正规稳定的岗位不足,很多人才会加入灵活就业大军谋生,而且那个群体中很多人的劳动强度和时间比稳定岗位工作者反而可能更高更多。这种情况下把一个假设理论拿到现实中来,宣扬灵活就业者在享受“福利”,并由此得出他们的社保就该低一些的结论,确实是荒谬的,让公众无法接受。老胡很难相信张丹丹教授作为北大国发院的副院长、博士生导师,区分不了劳动经济学中一个有明显前提的理论模型与我们当下实际情况的区别,我也无法相信她骨子里就是一个“坏人”“冷酷者”,对被动的灵活就业者毫无同情心。我看了她之前的一些发言,不仅很正常,而且显示她处在为灵活就业者争取权利的一线,比如她为给平台骑手们上社保大声疾呼,并且提出了很多具体建议。她似乎是中国学界为增加灵活就业群体权益做出最大实际努力的人之一。但她为什么会在节目中说出这番冷漠无情的话呢?老胡百思不得其解。

D | 我本人参加过很多视频录制,40分钟至60分钟的节目往往要录两个小时以上。

E | 做点善意的猜测:是否在这个过程中张丹丹讲了上边所说的劳动经济学的假设理论,然后在后期剪辑中没有突出这个理论的假设性,而被当成了张丹丹对现实的一种议论了呢?但如果是这样的话,张丹丹在节目播出之前看样片,应该指出来,要求修改,视频剪辑人也应该意识到这样播出有可能导致爆炸性的舆论事件,但为什么没有阻止呢?莫非张丹丹和节目制作方都不认为如此播出不会有太大问题?他们脱离互联网、脱离群众的程度真的如此严重吗?老胡一般都反对把一个说了错话的人往最坏的情况去想,下最极端的结论。老胡66岁了,我明确说:这个世界上没有那么多极端的坏人。把一个犯了一般错误的人往罪恶的方向去想,这绝不是好习惯。而且我看了张丹丹之前的各种发言之后,我认为在我们为自己看到的事情骂她的时候,不应该拒绝了解在我们没有看到的时候,她为灵活就业者还做过什么。

F | 然而无论如何,张丹丹说的那段话,特别是一个录播视频将那段话呈现出来的样子,就是挑衅了公众的情感,让无数人感到愤怒,也正是因为那段话的不可接受性太突出了、太强烈了,我感到有点诧异。所以我建议张丹丹做回应,该说明的说明,该致歉的致歉。

G |
Current article:http://0wd9ls.shaihanhuangwoshang.cyou/news/20260826_2254029.html
Published on:02:49:34
遗失的世界_Random reading
王者荣耀_Active users
奔跑吧兄弟_Hottest this week